Asus M2NBP-VM-CSM Instrukcja Użytkownika Pobierz pdf (Strona 9)

Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance on Microsoft Windows

Vista of Intel vPro technology-based and AMD processor-based PCs

in common business scenarios

Running a Monte Carlo simulation in Microsoft Office Excel 2007

Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the results of this test. The Intel vPro technology-based PC with the Intel Core 2 Duo

processor E6700 was 1.26 times faster than the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor-based PC.

As Figure 10 shows,

this difference meant

that the Intel vPro

technology-based PC

with the Intel Core 2

Duo processor

E6700 returned the

answer over a

second faster than

the AMD Athlon 64

X2 5200+ processor-

based PC.

PERFORMANCE RESULTS

(seconds)

COMPARATIVE RATING

AMD Athlon 64 X2

5200+ processor on

ASUS M2NBP-VM CSM

Intel vPro with Core 2

Duo processor E6700

on Intel DQ965GF

TASKS

AMD Athlon 64 X2

5200+ processor on

ASUS M2NBP-VM CSM

Intel vPro with Core 2

Duo processor E6700

on Intel DQ965GF

5.83 4.63

Task: Running

a Monte Carlo

simulation

1.00 1.26

Figure 10: Results for the Monte Carlo simulation for both test systems. Lower performance results are better. Higher

comparative ratings are better.

Figure 9: Normalized results for the Monte Carlo simulation for both test systems. Larger

numbers indicate better performance.

Monte Carlo simulation

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

Running a Monte Carlo simulation in

Microsoft Office Exce l 2007

Performance relative to AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

processor-based PC

AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

processor-based PC

Intel vPro technology based

PC w ith Intel Core 2 Duo

processor E6700

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 37 38

Komentarze do niniejszej Instrukcji

Brak uwag

Asus M2NBP-VM-CSM Instrukcja Użytkownika Strona 9

Komentarze do niniejszej Instrukcji

Powiązane produkty i podręczniki dla Networking Asus M2NBP-VM-CSM